|
Post by Pacific-Baller on Nov 12, 2005 15:15:41 GMT -5
lol oh ok.. you confused me lol.. u quoted my post on the article and then started talking about the pic again lol
|
|
|
Post by git r dun on Nov 17, 2005 13:35:31 GMT -5
I think KG may become a legend, he really is not a legend yet but if he keeps playing like he has been lately he will probably become a legend.
|
|
|
Post by ball4life on Nov 17, 2005 13:38:12 GMT -5
i thinkk he would, he's done alot for the NBA.
|
|
|
Post by and1 on Nov 17, 2005 20:18:04 GMT -5
Hall of famer, not a legend
|
|
|
Post by ball4life on Nov 18, 2005 13:38:29 GMT -5
there just about the same
|
|
|
Post by Pacific-Baller on Nov 18, 2005 18:48:18 GMT -5
The topic is "KG a Legend"...lol
|
|
|
Post by ball4life on Nov 21, 2005 13:28:14 GMT -5
lol, and i said their just about the same to me
|
|
|
Post by and1 on Dec 4, 2005 12:00:23 GMT -5
i dont tihnk so..... not at all..... legends are Dr J, MJ, Wilt chamberlain, i know all hall of famers but ..... Paul Arizin, Segei belov, David Bing, Bernard borgmann.... all hall of famers, but are they "legends?" i didnt even know who they were, i had to look it up
|
|
|
Post by ball4life on Dec 4, 2005 15:03:00 GMT -5
DR J, MJ, Wilt, are the best of the best, but i mean dave bing and them they are very good, and ledgends to people who know aloT about old school bball, they are over shadowed by Dr j, mj and them
|
|
|
Post by and1 on Dec 4, 2005 16:30:32 GMT -5
still , hall of famer and legend are very different
|
|
|
Post by Pacific-Baller on Dec 4, 2005 17:50:06 GMT -5
and1 is spot on. But the topic isn't asking if KG will be a Hall of Famer. It's saying Legend. Thats what I meant on my last post, wasn't saying against your thoughts.. People like to whinge a lot on this site lol
Nice discussion.
|
|
|
Post by aj25 on Dec 5, 2005 16:41:37 GMT -5
he is not a legand yet but he is working his way up there to be one of the tops. He will not become a legend for a while
|
|
porky88
Active Member
[M:0]
Posts: 160
|
Post by porky88 on Dec 5, 2005 17:45:06 GMT -5
Garnett isn't a legend YET..
He needs a ring or two before I would call him great. Guys like Shaq and yeah Duncan who I despise can carry a team on there back through the playoffs. Garnett is yet too do that. Now to be fair KG is still in his mid 20's and could end up winning a couple titles in the future. Right now at the pace he's going he'll end up more known like Karl Malone rather than Chamberline or Kareem.
|
|
|
Post by ball4life on Dec 5, 2005 18:50:57 GMT -5
Karl was just un lucky, he went to the finals 3 times and didn't win, that was more like bad luck
|
|
|
Post by aj25 on Dec 8, 2005 14:08:42 GMT -5
He has got the same initials as me andhe is working his way to be a legend. He will become one for sure soon.
|
|
|
Post by ball4life on Dec 8, 2005 17:57:25 GMT -5
yeh, i got AI
|
|
|
Post by and1 on Dec 11, 2005 10:28:03 GMT -5
and1 is spot on. But the topic isn't asking if KG will be a Hall of Famer. It's saying Legend. Thats what I meant on my last post, wasn't saying against your thoughts.. People like to whinge a lot on this site lol Nice discussion. i said- he might be a hall of famer but not a legend ball4life said- that is the same thing i said- all these unheard of players that are in the hall of fame... do you consider them legends ball4life said- they might be to old-school people i said- Hall of famer and legend are very differejnt sooooo... basically we r still on that discussion
|
|
|
Post by wowposter on Nov 13, 2008 7:43:42 GMT -5
|
|